|
Document 4: Paul D Otter, "The Morris Chair" 1923
Document 4: "The Morris
Chair" from Paul D. Otter, Furniture for the
Craftsman: A Manual for the Student and Mechanic,
1914, 1923. According to the Preface, the drawings and the
text originally appeared in issues of the trade journal,
The Building Age, before 1914, a fact that I
confirmed by obtaining photocopies of these articles.
The book's full title speaks
"volumes" about Otter himself, and the era in which/about
which he writes
FURNITURE FOR THE CRAFTSMAN:
A MANUAL FOR THE STUDENT AND MECHANIC, COVERING
THE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND FINISHING OF PRACTICALI (sic)
ALL THE ARTICLES USED IN THE FURNISHING AND EQUIPMENT OF THE
MODERN HOME, PORCH AND GROUNDS, WITH HINTS ON UPHOLSTERING, 1923.
|
The date of this book is deceptive.
My personal edition is dated 1923, but the first edition is
1914, and that material is, in turn, a re-working, virtually
unchanged, of material that originally appeared in pages of
The Building Age, a trade journal of the
period.
(The Building Age --
according to the Worldcat bibliographic database -- was
published between 1879 and 1930.)
Regretfully, bio info on Otter is
scarce -- but I intend to keep looking, because his voice
seems to predict the decline of the popularity enjoyed by
Arts and Crafts (or, "Mission") design in furniture.
Confirming this decline comes from some of the following
evidence (in the 1923 edition) reprinted below.
One further comment: None of
the contemporary furniture designers -- James Krenov, Sam
Maloof, and other who design the so-called "studio
furniture" are particularly appealing to me. Some modern
stuff, I like, as you'll see in my "memoir" as it progresses. Instead, I am inclined
toward some period furniture, much of the American Colonial,
for example, also Shaker, but especially Arts and Crafts.
In that light, I have great respect
and appreciation for such authorities on woodworking as Paul
D. Otter, but especially Franklin H Gottshall, who, as well
as teaching design, teach aesthetics. Gottshall's classic is
How to Design Period Furniture, 1937, and for
me, Otter's Furniture for the Craftsman, 1914, anticipates
what Gottshall achieved in the 1930s.
The influence of Gottshall on some of
my thinking about woodworking is also covered in my "memoir".
I anticipate that by letting these
personal biases "hang out," that I am inviting
contentiousness from other woodworkers. But differences of
this sort, for me, is OK. In the end, it all boils down to
taste.
| |
Document 4: "The Morris
Chair" from Paul D. Otter, Furniture for the
Craftsman: A Manual for the Student and Mechanic,
1914, 1923 (According to the Preface, the drawings
and the text originally appeared in issues of The Building Age before 1914.)
This section is from pp
60-61:
Before considering other
forms of cabinet work for the carpenter, it is in
place to study the subject of ornament as applied to
furniture, and under the term, ornament, is included
any embellishment not essential to the construction.
[I will be covering this topic more fully in the
narrative chapters, but in the meantime
check out some of the web-based material by clicking
on this link.] It seems a fitting time to write
along these lines, for at no period in the history
of furniture, since primitive construction, has
there been such a reaction against vitiated or
excessive ornament, and it is a significant fact
that a fad taken up by Americans represented in the
"Mission Style," and also the strong influence of
European crafts and guild workers in working along
plain lines, has brought about this happy trend of
taste.
The architect, designer or
craftsman today is a free subject. No kingly
patronage holds him to follow repeatedly the "period
styles, " which in this country are quite out of
place in the homes of our democratic people. We may
therefore be thankful it is the style to be plain
and be surrounded by furniture of a plain
substantial construction and outline. This state of
affairs does not dictate absolute avoidance of
ornament, for we as a people are extremists in some
things, and already an easing-up of the straight
line, and rounding-off of the sharp corner incident
to the first "Mission" patterns is in evidence, and
we have now with us the "Arts and Crafts," or
"Modern," which possesses features refreshing and
entitling it to be classed as a "style." Happily the
"Arts and Crafts" being the vogue, it is one to
which the carpenter can apply himself without the
bench experience of a French cabinet maker, and to
this end sketchy de-tails are here given to guide
him in the general requirements of brightening case
work with ornament, relief or open work.
Supposing, then, we follow
this thought in its bearing on relieving furniture
from absolute severity of case. Going back to the
"Mission Style," the old ecclesiastic carpenter in
making the few pieces of furniture for the simple
needs of his brother monks held to a rigid purpose
of making a table from which to eat, a chair to sit
upon -- not a table or a chair of a particular
design. Then, too, the lumber was hewn from the log
and few tools were at hand to continue the work.
These were deterrent influences for good design --
that is utility first. However, he was not
altogether clumsy or lacking in grace of line, for
in the few examples from which the style is derived
we see how he has tapered the lower part of a heavy
table leg or given a square bulblike effect to a
post, and in more elaborate pieces treated a back
rail to easy curves with corresponding hollows,
mindful, no doubt, of things seen in his early days
in Spain.
|
This section is from pp.
182-183:
There is always one or more
in the family who derive comfort from the Morris
chair or some other form of adjustable back chair,
while with others, like the tea or coffee drinkers,
there is nothing so restful as the excitable rocker.
When extreme comfort is sought for one may have to
make a personal test before being thoroughly
satisfied. In the case of the Morris chair the
luxurious softness of the cushions allows almost any
form to mold itself into a comfortable position, and
therefore the con-tents of the cushions should be of
the best grade of curled hair, with a mixture of
moss, tow or cotton. The bag form of cushion,
previously mentioned, is shown in the illustration,
although the style of the cushion with square edges
like carriage cushions is most generally used.

While dealing with cushions
it may be said here that the seat cushion is
supported either by a three-ply veneer panel tacked
to the inner strip, shown on the seat frame, Fig.
193, or the same open space is bridged over by heavy
upholstery burlap inter-woven and tacked to strips
and corner blocks. In tacking al-ways start with and
turn down a double thickness of the ends of bands to
avoid stripping through the tacks.
The back cushion is
supported by an open frame rack made of 7/8 x 1 1/8
inch material, the frame 18 x 30 1/2 inches outside,
with four 5/8 x 7/8 inch cross slats evenly spaced.
The bottom rail is hinged to the back rail of the
Morris chair seat frame, and the inclination of the
rack is made by resting it against a 3/8-inch steel
or brass rod, placed in any notch on the bracket
support shown on the rear of the chair.
The lower end of the back
cushion rests on the rear end of the seat cushion.
As to the chair frame there
is a field of change of style from Fig. 193. Using
the same seat plan create a different treatment
under the arms either by square spindles or three or
four slats or flat balusters under the arms.
Following the illustration,
the front and back posts and arm pillars are made of
stock dressed 13/1. inches square, the back posts
being finally cut from the bottom 1 1/2 inches to
give the chair proper angle. The side rails may be
dressed 13-16 inch thick, and with the upholstery
cleat on the inside of the same thickness they will
when glued be very substantial. This is a matter of
some consideration if more than one chair is to be
made, as stock costs much more if required over 1
inch in thickness. After the chair has been tried by
setting up, knock off all the sharp edges before the
final gluing.
|
|
|