Home
Contents
Appendix
Authors
Documents
Manuals
Glossary Intro and Glossary Annexes
A B C D E F G H I J K L M
N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Narrative Chapters
Chap 1 Chap 2 Chap 3 Chap 4 Chap 5 Chap 6
Chap 7 Chap 8 Chap 9 Chap 10 Chap 11 Chap 12

Document 15: C M Woodward, 1887, on the Importation of Russian System of Woodworking Instruction

Source: C M. Woodward The Manual Training School ...  Boston: D. C. Heath 1887, pages 2-4 


 

… In the same year, 1868, Victor Della-Vos introduced into the Imperial Technical (engineering) School at Moscow the Russian method of class-instruction in the use of tools. Here the students were eighteen years old on admission, and all were to become government engineers. The great value of the work of Della-Vos lay in the discovery of the true method of tool-instruction, for without his discovery the later steps would have been impossible. 

In 1870, under the direction of Prof. Robinson and Prest. J. M. Gregory of the University of Illinois, a wood-working shop was added to the appliances for the course in architecture, and an iron-working shop to the course in mechanical engineering in that institution. In 1871, the Stevens Institute of Hoboken, N. J., munificently endowed by Edwin A. Stevens, as a school of mechanical engineering, fitted up a series of shops for the use of its students. 

The next step forward was taken by Washington University in St. Louis in providing for all its engineering students systematic instruction in both wood and metals. In 1872, a large shop in the Polytechnic School was equipped with work-benches, two lathes, a forge, a gear-cutter and full sets of carpenters', machinists', and forging tools. The first work undertaken, was the construction of models for the illustration of mechanical principles. The inability of the students to use the tools with any facility soon led to the introduction of exercises for the sole purpose of tool-instruction. Thus un­consciously we were following in the steps of Della-Vos. This work was so far systematized as to be reported as follows in the University Catalogue of 1875 : — 

During the past year the students of each class [the four polytechnic classes being required to attend without regard to their course of study, while the classical students were at liberty to attend] have worked syste­matically in the shop under the direction of the professors, assisted by a skillful carpenter and a pattern-maker. The general method of conducting this work is as follows : A sketch of the piece or task to be constructed is given a class with all needed dimensions. Each student then makes a care­ful drawing of it to some convenient scale, with details and exact measure­ments. 

The class then goes to the shop, is furnished with the requisite materials and tools, and each member is shown by an expert how to execute the work. Every piece must be reasonably perfect or it is rejected and a new one is required. Although the students work in the shop no more than four hours per week, the experience is valuable. It is not supposed of course that skilled work can be produced by this method, but it is certain that such training will make better judges of workmanship. 

Thus far had we progressed when the Philadelphia Exposi­tion of 1876 was opened. 

None of us knew any thing of the Moscow school, or of the one in Bohemia in which the Russian method had been adopted in 1874. The Russian exhibit at Philadelphia was less of a surprise to me than to many. It showed with remarkable fullness and logical arrangement the true educational method of tool-instruction. It presented, clear-cut and definite, what before had been ill defined or unthought of. Before referring to the great work of Prof. Runkle in presenting the Russian method to the American people, I will give the story of our first series of workshops in the old " Philibert Mansion " on the ground where the University gymnasium now stands. 

In the summer of 1877, having outgrown our single shop, we transformed an old dwelling-house into shops, using the cham­bers for a carpenter-shop, the parlors for a machine-shop, and the basement for a forging-shop.

The Freshmen had benchwork in wood, the Sophomores wood-turning, the Juniors metal turning and fitting, and the Seniors forging. At that time, I wrote as follows in reference to Mr. Gottlieb Conzelman who had given the money for fitting up those shops : — 

I feel so sure that from this small beginning important consequences are to follow, that I almost envy Mr. Conzelman the satisfaction he will certainly feel in having contributed to its foundation.
 

For three years, with no essential change of plan, the shops were used. The instruction was very general, and our success with the polytechnic students and a class of thirty boys from Smith Academy of preparatory grade pointed out the way for the MANUAL TRAINING SCHOOL, whose building was erected in 1879, and which was opened in September, 1880.